Skip to content

Sport · The course

Football’s rule-book, from scratch

Tensections in three parts, in the order a newcomer needs them, then practice and two look-up tools. Read only the boxes marked “in one screen” and you have the short course; the pages carry the depth and the sources.

One live matter runs through it: the Premier League’s case against Manchester City, shown section by section as a dated example. Every finding in it is the Commission’s and under appeal, and it is never an exercise while any part of it is undecided.

The sections

Part 1

How the system works

Who holds the power, what the rule-book is, and where football's own system stops.

Part 2

A case from start to finish

From the League's first question to a final decision: the Commission, the appeal, the courts and the consequences.

Part 3

Money, and who else is affected

The financial rules, what a sanction does to the people around a club, and whether a rival can recover its loss.

Alongside the course

Practise and look up

Exercises on closed records, the rule finder and the glossary.

Who decides what?

The ladder a League dispute climbs, one rung at a time, and the forums that sit beside it. Each card says who decides, how to challenge it, who may speak for a party, and what counts as evidence. Rule numbers are from the 2022/23 Handbook unless stated.

Step 1

The League's Board

Who sits
The company's directors.
Decides
Inquires into suspected breaches; reprimands, fixed penalties, fines up to £100,000; refers cases to a Commission (W.1, W.3, W.8). Under the 2026/27 squad-cost rules, issues points deductions by formula.
Challenge
Summary fines: elect a Commission instead (W.10). Squad-cost decisions: arbitration within seven or 14 days (2026/27, Appendix 2, G.1).
Who may speak for a party
Not prescribed by the Rules.
Evidence
Its own inquiry: documents and answers on demand; confidentiality is no answer (W.1, W.15, W.16).

Sources: Handbook 2022/23 · Handbook 2026/27

Step 2

Commission

Who sits
Three members of the Disciplinary Panel, chaired by a lawyer (W.19).
Decides
Whether a breach is proved, and the sanction: fines, points, suspension, compensation, a recommendation to expel (W.51).
Challenge
Appeal to an Appeal Board within 14 days (W.67).
Who may speak for a party
A solicitor or counsel, on 14 days' notice (W.81).
Evidence
Not bound by court rules of evidence: “any reliable means” (W.80). The Board proves its case on the balance of probabilities (W.45).

Sources: Handbook 2022/23

Step 3

Appeal Board

Who sits
Three members of the Appeals Panel, chaired by someone who has held judicial office (W.63).
Decides
Allows or dismisses the appeal, varies the penalty, or sends the case back (W.78).
Challenge
Final, subject to Section X arbitration (W.79).
Who may speak for a party
A solicitor or counsel, on 14 days' notice (W.81).
Evidence
A review of the Commission's evidence; new evidence only if it could not have been obtained earlier with reasonable diligence (W.71, W.74).

Sources: Handbook 2022/23

Step 4

Section X tribunal

Who sits
Three arbitrators: one chosen by each side, a chair chosen by those two (X.8 to X.10).
Decides
Reviews a disciplinary decision on five grounds only: jurisdiction; fraud, malice or bad faith; serious procedural error; a perverse reading of the law; an unreasonable decision (X.4).
Challenge
The High Court, on jurisdiction or serious irregularity only; no appeal on a point of law (X.37; Arbitration Act 1996, ss.67–69).
Who may speak for a party
A solicitor or counsel; a club by one of its officials (X.38, X.40). By statute, “a lawyer or other person” unless otherwise agreed (s.36).
Evidence
The tribunal decides whether strict rules of evidence apply (s.34(2)(f)).

Sources: Handbook 2022/23 · Arbitration Act 1996, s.36 · Arbitration Act 1996, s.34

Step 5

High Court

Who sits
A judge of the Commercial Court.
Decides
Whether the tribunal had jurisdiction (s.67) or committed a serious irregularity causing substantial injustice (s.68). Stays court claims that belong in arbitration (s.9); can enforce an award (s.66).
Challenge
Further appeal only with the High Court's own permission ([2021] EWCA Civ 1110).
Who may speak for a party
Rights of audience are reserved to authorised persons (Legal Services Act 2007, s.12). A litigant may appear in person, with a McKenzie friend's help.
Evidence
The court's own rules.

Sources: Arbitration Act 1996 · [2021] EWCA Civ 1110 · Legal Services Act 2007, s.12

Beside the ladder

Employment Tribunal

Who sits
An employment tribunal (composition not covered here).
Decides
Statutory employment claims, which the Rules cannot take away (Employment Rights Act 1996, s.203).
Challenge
Not covered here.
Who may speak for a party
In person, or by counsel or a solicitor, a trade union or employers' association representative, or “any other person” (Employment Tribunals Act 1996, s.6(1)).
Evidence
The tribunal's own procedure rules.

Sources: Employment Rights Act 1996, s.203 · Employment Tribunals Act 1996, s.6

Beside the ladder

Football regulator

Who sits
The statutory regulator under the Football Governance Act 2025.
Decides
Operating licences and the suitability of owners and officers for the top five tiers (Parts 3 and 4). Must be notified before the League sanctions a club for a relevant rule breach (s.55).
Challenge
Internal review, then the Competition Appeal Tribunal; on a point of law, the Court of Appeal (s.84).
Who may speak for a party
Not covered here.
Evidence
Not covered here.

Sources: Football Governance Act 2025 (contents) · s.55 · s.84

Beside the ladder

Court of Arbitration for Sport

Who sits
A panel under the CAS Code, seated in Switzerland.
Decides
Appeals from UEFA and FIFA decisions, with “full power to review the facts and the law” (Code R57). Not League disputes (X.2.4).
Challenge
Not covered here.
Who may speak for a party
“Persons of their choice” (Code R30).
Evidence
The panel may exclude evidence that was available, or reasonably discoverable, before the decision appealed against (Code R57).

Sources: CAS Code (2025), R30 and R57 · CAS 2020/A/6785

As at 2026-10-07 — 11 of 11 sections approved. Drafts are linked for review while the wing is hidden; the wing cannot go live until every section is approved. probative.io is a research and investigations practice, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice.